NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Monday, August 14, 2006
Megan Basham :: Townhall.com Columnist
Conservatives Look a Gift Film in the Mouth
by Megan Basham
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
With the decision in Belmont, CA to ban smoking in condos & apartments, do you think Houston should adopt a similar ban?



Like a lot of conservative film critics, I was more than a little apprehensive to hear that anti-American conspiracy theorist Oliver Stone would be making a movie about 9/11. Fortunately, whatever his past cinematic sins and however many he may commit in the future, there is no reason to fear World Trade Center. On the contrary, Stone gives us many reasons to stand up and applaud.

His latest (and, to date, most successful) effort tells the true story of John McLoughlin (Nicholas Cage) and Will Jimeno (Michael Pena), two Port Authority police officers who went into the World Trade Center to save lives and ended up needing rescuing themselves. Jumping between the trapped officers, their frantic spouses, and their would-be rescuers, Stone turns the memory of the U.S.’s worst day into a requiem that tells of our honor and triumph as much as our pain and devastation.

The most nuclear of families gather to pray through their distress; a marine-turned-accountant leaves his home in Connecticut and heads for ground zero to offer whatever service he can; a faith-filled clergyman tells a parishioner that if he truly feels Jesus calling on him to save victims, he must find a way to answer; and servicemen, paramedics, and local officers risk their lives together rescuing the fallen. At no point are any Americans, be they soldiers, civilians, or politicians, portrayed as anything other than stalwart patriots determined to do good in the most devastating of circumstances.

In fact, so much pro-America, pro-faith sentiment pervades World Trade Center some mainstream critics like The Los Angeles Times’ Kenneth Turan panned it for making “an explicit connection between Sept. 11 and the war in Iraq that will make the Bush White House and the Republican National Committee eager to embrace it as their own.”

What then could right-leaning reviewers object to other than Stone’s grandiose directorial style and Cage’s continuing penchant for over-acting? Somehow, a lot.

Says Brian Carney of The Wall Street Journal, “…there are no villains in Mr. Stone's movie. Nicholas Cage's John McLoughlin and Michael Pena's Will Jimeno could have been trapped by an earthquake or an accident.” National Review Online’s critic Peter Suderman charges, “His movie all but ignores political and societal ramifications of that day...” And Human Events’ Janice Shaw Crouse complains, “Except for the shadow of a plane that foretells the terrorism, Stone's version of the story morphs into just another challenging event or natural disaster.”

While it is true that Stone’s acknowledgments of the Muslim perpetrators are subtle, as befits the personal focus of the story, they are unquestionably present. Cage’s character comments that though authorities planned for biological warfare and many other kinds of attacks, “Nobody planned for this.” The marine tells his coworkers, “"I don't know if you guys know it yet, but this country's at war,” and later calls them to say he’s reenlisting because, “It’s going to take good people to avenge this.” Police officers watching the carnage on television repeatedly curse “the bastards,” under their breath. And a postscript informs the audience that said marine will go on to further serve his country in two tours of duty in Iraq. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Megan Basham is the author of Beside Every Successful Man: A Woman's Guide To Having It All

Be the first to read Megan Basham's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: Stone's film
The only legitimate reason -and I'm not saying it IS the reason - for virtually no mention of the attacks being terrorist, is that when the firemen and other first responders went into the Tower, they didn't KNOW who the perpetrators were and probably did not know all that was happening around them. Remember the communications that day were sporadic at best with comm. equipment not working. I'm no fan of Stone, but this to me is a possible reason. Of course he may think to include the information if "politicizing" it. I don't believe including a fact of history is politicizing anything.

And added note...
Thank you, Mario, for your astute observations.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Keep up-to-date with your local  KNTH community.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.