NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Bob  Burney :: Townhall.com Columnist
Dancing on the Grave of the Church
by Bob Burney
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
With the decision in Belmont, CA to ban smoking in condos & apartments, do you think Houston should adopt a similar ban?



George Barna, the beloved Christian pollster, recently announced to the world in his book “Revolution” that the institutional church was dead. That was not a problem, however, because Barna also announced a “New Reformation” that would sweep our land. He promised that this was going to “amount to a Third Great Awakening in the United States, but with a very different look, feel and outcome than previous religious upheaval.” 

According to Barna, the age of the local [read: institutional] church was dead and would be replaced by simple house churches and other non-traditional gatherings of believers. The book caused quite a stir in the evangelical world, but fortunately it was mostly ignored and Barna’s claims faded into obscurity. That was then. Like a bad horror movie (is there another kind?), “He’s back!” This time Barna is not only continuing his claim that the church is dead, he appears to be dancing on her grave.

Few people have done more for evangelical Christianity in the last 20 years than George Barna and his research organization. Month after month and year after year The Barna Group has provided vital research into religious trends across the American religious landscape. He has provided information that has been invaluable in analyzing the spiritual temperature of America. But something unfortunate has happened.  

It is rare for an “objective” pollster to release the results of a poll wrapped in an extended   “commercial” for the pollster’s newest book. But this is what appears to be the case with Barna’s latest release. And probably not coincidentally, the poll results reinforce the conclusions of the new book (“Pagan Christianity?: Exploring the Roots of Our Christian Practices”). All the credibility that The Barna Group has worked so hard to establish now lies in the ashes of self-promotion. 

The gist of the poll is that Americans are now embracing “various alternatives to a conventional church experience as being fully biblical.” Among the more startling results of the poll is that 89 percent of adults feel that an individual family worship time is just as biblical as corporate worship at a church. 75 percent believe a “house church” is valid and 69 percent feel watching a religious television program is just a biblical as attending a church. 

Unlike most Barna polls, the wording is vague and somewhat misleading. There is no indication that those responding to the poll feel that these activities are to be to the exclusion of a local church experience, but that is the way the statistics are presented. Objectivity appears gone in favor of Barna’s personal biases. Read the poll and you come away with the conclusion that the local church is either dead or dying.

The “research” portion of the article at ends with the surprising number of pastors who are now embracing house churches. Indeed, Barna states that “two out of three pastors agreed that ‘house churches are legitimate Christian churches.’” (He adds that most of those pastors are from liberal, main-line denominations.) Barna then takes a swipe at those who disagree and implies that those pastors who do not support house churches are the ones making the big bucks from the institutional church. Where’s the objectivity evident in Barna’s past work?   

Following the brief results of the latest poll, Barna then uses the results of the poll to hype his new book, “Pagan Christianity? Exploring the Roots of Our Christian Practices.” This is where things really get bizarre.

One of the more sensational claims of the new book is that most of what happens in your local church has “pagan” origins. For example, church buildings are “pagan.” Barna tells us that all of the early Christian churches met in homes. Proof? Well … everybody knows that.   Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Bob Burney is Salem Communications’ award-winning host of Bob Burney Live, heard weekday afternoons on WRFD-AM 880 in Columbus, Ohio.

Be the first to read Bob Burney’s column.
Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.
Sign up today
Subject: The Church!
I being Christian, always thought that a Church Building was a place to gather and praise and serve God, out of the weather. I started out, attending services in a house. Soon as the congregatiion grew, it was readily apparent there was need for a Church building. So, we decided to build a building, and when we were finished, thats what we had, just a building,but it wasn't a Church, the people who were of a particular belief there was the Church, and we as a Church worshiped our Heavenly Father as members of HIS CHURCH. We did so out of the Rain, sleet, snow, whatever, and we fellowshipped there just as we did in the house. So didn't worship the preacher, nor was the building fancy inside. No Christian rock band to get us in the mood to praise the Lord, just plain old singing, and I liked it that way!

The nature of Satan, etc. continued---
God is not all-powerful in the pagan sense of being able to do anything conceivable. He can only do what can be done according to the laws of the universe. For instance, he cannot be virtuous and evil simultaneously nor can he create automatons with moral choice. In the nature of reality, morality requires freedom to choose between moral virtue and moral evil. For man to be made in God’s image and likeness, he had to be created free to choose and thus free to do vast evil that God can counter only when a spiritually powerful church prays and works in his power against that evil. The apostate church is no help to God whatsoever in counteracting evil in our world.

An accurate biblical view of God’s omniscience is that, though he knows the past and what is going on in the present, he cannot know with certainty what people will do in the future because of man’s free choice. It is a serious mistake to blame God for the evil that men do because you mistakenly assume that God knew beforehand what was going to happen and didn’t stop it. Even had he known what would happen in a given circumstance, there is reason to believe he could not have stopped it given the laws of reality and man’s spiritual blindness resulting in an inability to be divinely instructed and guided to avoid the catastrophy.

As a former skeptic of all things religious myself, I am totally convinced that the great majority of atheism in our world today is due to the Satanically inspired misunderstandings of Scripture passed down to us from Origin, Augustine and Calvin that make Christianity seem to be unreasonable and even loony tunes. The truth, however, frees us to believe.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*