NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Thursday, November 05, 2009
Max Schulz :: Townhall.com Columnist
Why Rush on Global Warming?
by Max Schulz
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Should Eric Holder be confirmed for Attorney General?

The ABC News headline this week said it all: “U.S. Must Lead Way in Clean Energy Technology, Agency Heads Say; Administration Officials Push for the Swift Passing of Kerry-Boxer Climate Change Legislation.”

It’s that second part—about the need for swift passage of global warming legislation—that tells the whole story.

Arguing with Idiots By Glenn Beck

Of course President Obama wants quick passage. For months the public has focused on the bruising health care fight taking place in Washington. Along with congressional allies like John Kerry, Barbara Boxer, and Nancy Pelosi, Obama would like nothing better than to rush global warming regulation through congress before the public can turn proper attention to a proposal under which, as the President himself has put it, “electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.”

But that’s just part of what proponents of a costly cap-and-trade system would rather the public not hear. The president’s advisers would like to ram through their climate proposals before the public catches wind of the overwrought rhetoric bubbling up from the fevered swamps of global warming alarmism.

Consider the interview Lord Nicholas Stern gave to The Times of London decrying the carbon content of people’s food. “Meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases,” he said. “I am not sure that people fully understand what we are talking about or the kind of changes that will be necessary” to stave off global warming.

Give up meat to save the planet? That seems to be what he is saying. The old saw used to be that meat is murder. Now it’s suicide. Lord Stern is no gadfly crank, either. He is the most distinguished authority on climate change in the United Kingdom, and authored a landmark 2006 study on global warming economics. More than anyone, Lord Stern advanced the controversial notion that we can constrain our economies today to ward off tomorrow’s climate catastrophe. Now he says we must become vegetarians too.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, meanwhile, claims failure to pass a new Kyoto-style agreement at December’s global warming summit will doom us. Literally. “If we do not reach a deal at this time, let us be in no doubt: once the damage from unchecked emissions growth is done, no retrospective global agreement, in some future period, can undo that choice,” he said. Hear that? We have just weeks to save the planet. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Max Schulz is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall columns and Townhall.com's daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.

News Articles On This Topic
 
Popular Articles By Schulz

Why not go vegetarian?
I am. But that's not the issue, insane environmentalism is the issue.

Use google to research CO2 in Earth's atmosphere. Here are the facts and the math.

Earth's air contains about 385 parts CO2 per million--only 0.0385% CO2. Of that, most consider less than 5% CO2 is man-made. So man-made CO2 is only 19 parts per million (PPM).

Most consider the US, with some 5% (?) of the population contributes 29% of man-made CO2. And 29% of the 19 PPM is 6 PPM--and that's todays emissions, absent any bill.

So, whether it's the Waxman bill or the Kerry bill, even at the "best" projected/requested CO2 reductions of 80%, you're talking about getting rid of FIVE molecules out of every MILLION molecules. And still, true scientists argue whether rising CO2 levels are a LEADING indicator of rising temperatures, or a TRAILING indicator of COOLING temperatures.

This has NOTHING to do with saving the planet--it has to do with DESTROYING the United States of America!!!

Wake up everybody! If we, as a people rise up against the Al Gore's of the world by throwing a glass of cold water on them whenever they raise their heads, we might convince everyone that...

THESE PEOPLE ARE ALL WET!!!

i (11/06/2009 - 12:45 AM)

Water is recycled, not wasted

"Meat is a wasteful use of water"

How can you waste water? The only water I know that has left the planet in all history is whatever may have been left on the moon.

Water is recycled, not wasted.

I'm not smart enough to know the answer to this, but I never heard that any water has been created since the world was created, and I have no idea how any water could escape the earth.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Keep up-to-date with your local  KNTH community.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.