NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Obama: Iraq now needs a political solution
By DAVID ESPO
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
With the decision in Belmont, CA to ban smoking in condos & apartments, do you think Houston should adopt a similar ban?



Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama declined Tuesday to rate the Bush administration's troop surge in Iraq a success despite a reduction in violence, and expressed understanding of Gen. David Petraeus' opposition to a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops.

"Not surprisingly he wants to retain as much flexibility as possible," Obama said of the general, with whom he met in recent days while touring Iraq.

"I think he wants maximum flexibility to be able to _ to do what he believes needs to be done inside of Iraq.

"But keep in mind, for example, one of Gen. Petraeus' responsibilities is not to think about how could we be using some of that $10 billion a month to shore up a U.S. economy that is really hurting right now," Obama said.

"If I'm president of the United States, that is part of my responsibility."

Obama commented at a news conference after arriving in Jordan, his first stop on an election-season trip to the Mideast and Europe paid for by campaign funds.

His remarks about Iraq drew criticism from Tucker Bounds, spokesman for Republican candidate John McCain. "By admitting that his plan for withdrawal places him at odds with Gen. David Petraeus, Barack Obama has made clear that his goal remains unconditional withdrawal rather than securing the victory our troops have earned," the aide said.

The Illinois senator opposed the war from the start and has long called for the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops along a 16-month timetable. He favors leaving a force of undetermined size behind to help counter terrorists, protect U.S. personnel and facilities and train Iraqis.

He said he would consult with military commanders to determine how many troops to keep in the country to protect diplomatic and humanitarian operations, to train Iraqis and to conduct counterterrorism operations against al-Qaida in Iraq.

He also opposed Bush's decision to add 30,000 troops more than a year ago, saying it would not succeed, although a gradual reduction in violence and U.S. casualties has called that prediction into question.

Asked for his current assessment, he said, "I believe that the situation in Iraq is more secure than it was a year and a half ago."

Yet he added, "I think that the definition of success depends on how you look at it.

"Originally, the administration suggested that the key measure was whether it gave breathing room for political reconciliation. So far, I think we have not seen the kind of political reconciliation that's going to bring about long-term stability in Iraq," he said.

Obama toured two war zones with Sens. Jack Reed, D-R.I., and Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., both of whom joined him at a news conference at the Amman Citadel, an ancient hilltop ruin that bears evidence of settlements dating to 2000 B.C. The skyline of modern-day Amman, cement dwellings and the occasional mosque, formed a made-for-television backdrop.

The three lawmakers issued a written statement last week saying that Afghanistan, where the Taliban is resurgent and Osama bin Laden believed to be hiding, is the central front in the war against terrorism. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
Subject: Charles,
Either you are lying, ignorant, uninfomred or all three when you say,

"Al-Maliki proved it by saying it over and over again that he didn't support Obama's view of a 16 month's withdrawal time frame if Obama was elected."

STOP LYING CHARLES AND OTHER CONSERVATIVES. Here is what he actually did say and a link to the English translation of the interview:

SPIEGEL: Would you hazard a prediction as to when most of the US troops will finally leave Iraq?

Maliki: As soon as possible, as far as we're concerned. U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes.

SPIEGEL: Is this an endorsement for the US presidential election in November? Does Obama, who has no military background, ultimately have a better understanding of Iraq than war hero John McCain?

Maliki: Those who operate on the premise of short time periods in Iraq today are being more realistic. Artificially prolonging the tenure of US troops in Iraq would cause problems... The tenure of the coalition troops in Iraq should be limited.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,566852,00. html



The Iraq Solution

Is to keep liberals as far away from it as possible. Especially Barack. He's been over there lolly gagging around in the safe zones we've provided and now thinks he's an expert. What a loser.

He and the rest of his Democrat buddies have done everything to undermine the effort in Iraq and undermine our troops. The neyyorktreasontimes has givin away national security secrets during the war, not a peep of denounciation from Barack. No unity, solidarity.
The democrats Barack included, have held up the funding for the troops so they didn't have the safety equiptment they needed. They boiled the insurgents confidence with widespread media coverage of their lack of support for America resulting in many more American deaths.

That is why the insurgency was so large. They saw the unruly left charging against America led by Barack Obama and followed suit.

Thanks for nothing Barack Mohamed!

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State: